-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 310
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add token usage tracking #872
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
- MemoryAnswer.cs: Imported TokenUsage class and added TokenUsage property. - SearchClient.cs: Refactored GenerateAnswer method, added prompt creation, token count logic, and updated RenderFactTemplate call. - TokenUsage.cs: Created TokenUsage class to track token counts.
I think we should use actual usage reports from the AI services when available, to avoid the risk of returning incorrect information, particularly when token count is important for billing. I would also design the report to support a list, because multiple AI calls are involved, and potentially to different models and different services. For models where the report data is unavailable, we can fallback to tokenizers, using different keys like Something like: {
"requests": [
{
"id": "A0E4C1D0-0D1A-4D3B-8D3D-3D0D1A0E4C1D",
"date": "2024-10-30T12:00:00Z",
"service": "Azure OpenAI",
"model": "GPT-4o-mini",
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 123,
"output_tokens": 456,
"output_reasoning_tokens": 50
}
},
{
"id": "C1D0B1E4-4D3B-0D1A-8D3D-E4C1D3D0D1A0",
"date": "2024-10-30T12:00:00Z",
"service": "Azure OpenAI",
"model": "text-embedding-ada-002",
"usage": {
"prompt_tokens": 123,
"total_tokens": 123
}
},
{
"date": "2024-10-30T12:00:00Z",
"service": "LlamaSharp",
"model": "llama2",
"usage": {
"estimated_input_tokens": 123,
"estimated_output_tokens": 456
}
}
]
} |
In fact, I initially started with that kind of implementation in my branch https://github.com/marcominerva/kernel-memory/tree/token_usage (see in particular https://github.com/marcominerva/kernel-memory/blob/5a3a77f62a2a22d88fe85ad5efb8426731e9d4a5/extensions/AzureOpenAI/AzureOpenAITextGenerator.cs#L148-L150), but then I found some blocking issues like microsoft/semantic-kernel#9420. So, I thought that we can start with the "manual" approach, and then progressively update it with the actual usage reports from the different services. Token usage is one of the most request feature by my customers, and having a value such the one proposed in this PR, even if not 100% accurate, is much better than not having a value at all 😄 . Also because, at the moment, they use this exact approach when they need to get an idea of token usage, with the problem that the actual prompt is "hidden", and the only point in which its size is shown is in the logger: kernel-memory/service/Core/Search/SearchClient.cs Lines 409 to 416 in 67472d5
|
I would use the service data when available and include the tokenizer optionally. Using the tokenizer is a performance concern, so it would be nice if we could turn it off. Something like this: PR 1
PR 2
PR 3
|
So do you mean something like this: https://github.com/marcominerva/kernel-memory/tree/token_usage? Check in particular the following implementations:
In case, we can close this PR and opens a new one pointing to the |
Motivation and Context (Why the change? What's the scenario?)
This PR adds a new
TokenUsage
property toMemoryAnswer
to hold information about token usage.High level description (Approach, Design)
Token usage is calculated in the
SearchClient.AskAsync
method using the configured tokenizer.