Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test_runner: simplify hook running logic #55963

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

@cjihrig cjihrig commented Nov 23, 2024

This commit removes some asynchronous logic from the runHook() method and replaces ArrayPrototypeReduce() with a for loop.

This commit removes some asynchronous logic from the runHook()
method and replaces ArrayPrototypeReduce() with a for loop.
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/test_runner

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test_runner Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem. labels Nov 23, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.99%. Comparing base (3178a76) to head (f74fddd).
Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #55963   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.99%   87.99%           
=======================================
  Files         653      653           
  Lines      187852   187852           
  Branches    35888    35886    -2     
=======================================
+ Hits       165295   165306   +11     
+ Misses      15729    15724    -5     
+ Partials     6828     6822    -6     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/internal/test_runner/test.js 96.97% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 25 files with indirect coverage changes

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

@atlowChemi atlowChemi added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Nov 23, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Nov 23, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95 aduh95 added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Nov 23, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Nov 24, 2024

@cjihrig cjihrig added commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. and removed needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Nov 24, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Nov 25, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit b09618e into nodejs:main Nov 25, 2024
72 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in b09618e

@cjihrig cjihrig deleted the hooks branch November 25, 2024 02:52
Ceres6 pushed a commit to Ceres6/node that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
This commit removes some asynchronous logic from the runHook()
method and replaces ArrayPrototypeReduce() with a for loop.

PR-URL: nodejs#55963
Reviewed-By: Pietro Marchini <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
This commit removes some asynchronous logic from the runHook()
method and replaces ArrayPrototypeReduce() with a for loop.

PR-URL: #55963
Reviewed-By: Pietro Marchini <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. test_runner Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants