-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8179502: Enhance OCSP, CRL and Certificate Fetch Timeouts #2747
Open
alexeybakhtin
wants to merge
3
commits into
openjdk:master
Choose a base branch
from
alexeybakhtin:JDK-8179502
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @alexeybakhtin and @GoeLin,
After e73f8c1,
DEFAULT_READ_TIMEOUT
is now unused and can be removed.Apparently, this backward-compatibility problem went undetected in the original change. Please also note that the behavior is no longer aligned with the CSR (emphasis by me):
com.sun.security.ocsp.readtimeout
is now an exceptional case, it won't default to the 15 seconds timeout, but tocom.sun.security.ocsp.timeout
(which defaults to 15 seconds).Should the CSR be adjusted? Otherwise, how do we ensure Oracle's backport behaves the same way? I don't have enough backporting experience, is it usually accepted to diverge from newer releases (≥ 21u) in a backport CSR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @franferrax
Thank you for the finding. I'll remove
DEFAULT_READ_TIMEOUT
You are right, the CSR for update releases should be updated for
com.sun.security.ocsp.readtimeout
default value. I'll do it and ask you to review it from an engineering point of view.I hope in this way, without backward compatibility, the patch will be accepted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will take a look, but please note I'm not a Reviewer.
One more comment, I see that the following issues are not part of the backport. Although all of them are test-only changes (mostly tuning the timeout), we might also want to include these to avoid some instability.
The last one is an ongoing effort to try to fix JDK-8309754, so we could alternatively wait for that fix and then make all the 5 backports together.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Backport PRs are created for test fixes