-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-42371: Update core reference to ignore automatically-added operator labels #40
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: lack The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@lack: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-42371, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/cc @imiller0 |
@@ -4,3 +4,6 @@ metadata: | |||
name: openshift-nmstate | |||
annotations: | |||
workload.openshift.io/allowed: management | |||
labels: | |||
name: openshift-nmstate | |||
openshift.io/cluster-monitoring: "true" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The name appears to be automatically added (though I'm not sure why...) . The monitoring looks to be a specific opt-in. If that is the case it should either be included in the reference CR as well or ignored via metadata.yaml if we don't care.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MarSik : What's your verdict? I don't know enough about either of these, or the core RDS, to know which, if either, should be optional.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need someone from nmstate or networking here, I have no idea.
…erator labels Signed-off-by: Jim Ramsay <[email protected]>
d54c223
to
2f92d0c
Compare
Signed-off-by: Jim Ramsay [email protected]