Only allow submission of Leaders portion of form if a company is marked as "Leaders Eligible" via label

[Shinsina]

Portal Homepage NOT LEADER:

Portal Homepage LEADER:

Following submission of Leaders portion if not eligible:

This would only occur if somehow a user navigated to the Leaders portion of their respective Company Update form (which would have to be done via the URL as there isn't a button presented to them to be directed to it) and attempted to submit that portion.

[Shinsina]

Allow configuration of display of Leaders on Company Update form only if the Company "is a leader"

[solocommand]

@Shinsina There are a couple of structural issues to address, but this must be an opt-in configurable option, not a change made across the board. Existing customers have this already deployed with expected functionality, and at least one (AB Media) uses it to add companies to the leaders program, not just update the selections.

The out-of-the-box solution that is supposed to be used for selecting which companies are allowed to see the leadership submission segment is the leadershipCompanyLabel config.

[Shinsina]

@Shinsina There are a couple of structural issues to address, but this must be an opt-in configurable option, not a change made across the board. Existing customers have this already deployed with expected functionality, and at least one (AB Media) uses it to add companies to the leaders program, not just update the selections.

The out-of-the-box solution that is supposed to be used for selecting which companies are allowed to see the leadership submission segment is the leadershipCompanyLabel config.

@solocommand Want to start out in saying I ultimately don't care how we handle this but I want the reasoning/rationale and most importantly the expected behavior provided a specific company criteria to be consistent, my understanding via previous discussions was to "make the form logic and the site logic the same for determining who is or is not a leader" and this would be doing that.

The leaderCompanyLabel concept is only found within this form and doesn't provide any sort of qualifications elsewhere as to "who is or is not a leader" which adds potential points of confusion as to "who is what and how". If ultimately we would rather use labels for determining that logic, my personal opinion would be to do that everywhere but as it stands currently that isn't how it works and I understand there is more to it than just flipping logic one way or the other.

Additionally, I wasn't able to find anyone using leadershipCompanyLabel, it's possible I missed it in glancing over the Rancher configurations for this, if you could let me know by whatever means as to who is currently using the form in that fashion, would be much appreciated.

Ultimately another additional configuration option to opt into this behavior (showing leaders only to companies that meet isLeaders criteria) is fine but I would rather we use existing behavior (such as the labels) than creating new behavior (which is what this is currently doing at least from the form side).

[Shinsina]

@solocommand In the current state I've opted to just use the existing label configuration option, this separates the logic of "Leaders Eligible" from "Is a Leader" entirely so as not to cause potential points of conflict or confusion as to who gets what and how between this and the site.