Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
hw/nvme: fix BAR size mismatch of SR-IOV VF
PF initializes SR-IOV VF BAR0 region in nvme_init_sriov() with bar_size calcaulted by Primary Controller Capability such as VQFRSM and VIFRSM rather than `max_ioqpairs` and `msix_qsize` which is for PF only. In this case, the bar size reported in nvme_init_sriov() by PF and nvme_init_pci() by VF might differ especially with large number of sriov_max_vfs (e.g., 127 which is curret maximum number of VFs). And this reports invalid BAR0 address of VFs to the host operating system so that MMIO access will not be caught properly and, of course, NVMe driver initialization is failed. For example, if we give the following options, BAR size will be initialized by PF with 4K, but VF will try to allocate 8K BAR0 size in nvme_init_pci(). #!/bin/bash nr_vf=$((127)) nr_vq=$(($nr_vf * 2 + 2)) nr_vi=$(($nr_vq / 2 + 1)) nr_ioq=$(($nr_vq + 2)) ... -device nvme,serial=foo,id=nvme0,bus=rp2,subsys=subsys0,mdts=9,msix_qsize=$nr_ioq,max_ioqpairs=$nr_ioq,sriov_max_vfs=$nr_vf,sriov_vq_flexible=$nr_vq,sriov_vi_flexible=$nr_vi \ To fix this issue, this patch modifies the calculation of BAR size in the PF and VF initialization by using different elements: PF: `max_ioqpairs + 1` with `msix_qsize` VF: VQFRSM with VIFRSM Signed-off-by: Minwoo Im <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Klaus Jensen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <[email protected]> Message-Id: <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information