SHIFT_BSS be gone

[Alto1772]

No description provided.

[BowserSlug]

🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀 This PR matches 8 functions (+0.00%) on jp.
🚀 This PR matches 1 function (+0.00%) on ique.

[ethteck]

Echoing what I said in discord:

I am all for the asm moving into src/ changes

I'll need some more time with it regarding all the BSS stuff

my main concern with this approach is the fact that making things static unfortunately makes them less visible. However, it seems like SHIFT_BSS was defined as just static in some cases anyway...hmm

[Alto1772]

my main concern with this approach is the fact that making things static unfortunately makes them less visible. However, it seems like SHIFT_BSS was defined as just static in some cases anyway...hmm

Yeah good suggestion. The reason I did is to just be made as intended by the original developers. The BSS addresses located between the 2 common sections were originally meant to be static so I made it one too...

As a suggestion and my personal understanding, I'll just make the static ones visible by using BSS macro instead. (addendum: except for the libultra & nusys ones)