Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add vehicle data in diagnostics #257

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2024

Conversation

jschlyter
Copy link
Contributor

@jschlyter jschlyter commented Dec 7, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced diagnostics for car entries, now including detailed attributes such as "name" and "data" alongside "vin" and "model."
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved data structure for car diagnostics to provide a more comprehensive view.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 7, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the async_get_config_entry_diagnostics function within the diagnostics.py file of the polestar_api component. The function's output for the "cars" key in the diagnostics dictionary has been enhanced to include additional attributes, specifically "name" and "data," alongside the existing "vin" and "model" attributes. This results in a more comprehensive representation of each car while maintaining the overall structure of the returned dictionary.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
custom_components/polestar_api/diagnostics.py Modified async_get_config_entry_diagnostics to include "name" and "data" attributes for each car in the diagnostics output.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Diagnostics
    participant CarData

    User->>Diagnostics: Request Diagnostics
    Diagnostics->>CarData: Fetch Car Information
    CarData-->>Diagnostics: Return Car Details (vin, model, name, data)
    Diagnostics-->>User: Return Diagnostics with Car Details
Loading

🐇 "In the world of cars, we now see,
More details shared, oh what glee!
With names and data, all in a row,
Diagnostics shine, like a bright rainbow!
Hops of joy, for changes made,
In our code, new paths are laid!" 🌈


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
custom_components/polestar_api/diagnostics.py (1)

27-27: Follow HomeAssistant's diagnostic data patterns

While adding more diagnostic data is valuable, consider following HomeAssistant's diagnostic patterns:

  1. Define constants for relevant diagnostic fields
  2. Document the structure of exposed data
  3. Consider adding debug logging for sensitive/verbose data instead of including in diagnostics

Consider adding these structural improvements:

# At module level
DIAGNOSTIC_CAR_FIELDS = {
    "battery_level",
    "charging_status",
    "odometer",
    # Add other relevant fields
}

# In the diagnostics function
def _prepare_car_diagnostics(car) -> dict[str, Any]:
    """Prepare car diagnostic data with relevant fields only."""
    return {
        "vin": car.vin,
        "name": car.name,
        "data": {k: car.data[k] for k in DIAGNOSTIC_CAR_FIELDS if k in car.data}
    }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1edbb76 and 3ae4411.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • custom_components/polestar_api/diagnostics.py (1 hunks)

custom_components/polestar_api/diagnostics.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@jschlyter jschlyter merged commit a2017b2 into pypolestar:main Dec 7, 2024
5 checks passed
@jschlyter jschlyter deleted the diagnostics_data branch December 7, 2024 10:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant