Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update provided context if readonly Prop changes #687

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Kai-W
Copy link

@Kai-W Kai-W commented Dec 2, 2024

Changing a read only prop recreates an component. But if the component provides values with a context the context did not get updated . Additionally if the context changes all componets below need to be updated to work with the new context see
This pr adds a forced redraw (change of dumy state) after provided.current gets changed.
I tried changing provided to a useState but this resultet in an redraw loop ( provided changes -> useCallbacks need to update with the provided values -> layoutEffect reexecutes and remounts componets -> provided changes).

The solution feels kind of hacky but i didn't want to rewrite the core logic with all the useRefs. This could leed to more bugs, but i am open to suggestions/alternative solutions. This forced Redraw should not leed to Problems. The mount callbak only gets called once on initial draw and once after a readonly prop changes.

To update all components using the context it was added to the dependency array. This implys that all components using the context get remounted by the useLayoutEffect (callbacks change, layoutEffect gets reexecuted). This fixes

I added a test to check for correct context after a readonly prop changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new readOnlyProp for Component1, enhancing its functionality.
    • Added a useForceRedraw function to improve component responsiveness to context updates.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated tests for Component1 to ensure correct behavior with the new readOnlyProp and onUpdate event.
  • Chores

    • Refined dependency arrays in hooks for better execution order and responsiveness.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several updates to the Component1 test suite in src/core/component.test.tsx, including the addition of a new readOnlyProp boolean property. The tests have been adjusted to verify the correct handling of this property and its propagation through the component context. Additionally, a new function useForceRedraw has been added to src/core/hooks.ts, enhancing the reactivity of the component to context updates. Modifications to the dependency arrays in various hooks ensure improved responsiveness during state changes.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/core/component.test.tsx Updated Component1 props to include readOnlyProp. Adjusted tests to verify its behavior. Enhanced onUpdate event tests.
src/core/hooks.ts Added useForceRedraw function. Modified dependency arrays in updateProperties, mount, and unmount functions to include ctx. Updated useEffect dependency for property updates.

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
A new prop hops in today!
With redraws swift and tests so bright,
Our components dance in delight.
Hooray for changes, let’s all cheer,
For every line, we hold so dear! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/core/hooks.ts (2)

55-58: LGTM! Consider adding explicit return type.

The implementation is clean and effectively serves its purpose of forcing a re-render.

Consider adding an explicit return type for better type safety:

-function useForceRedraw(){
+function useForceRedraw(): () => void {

219-221: LGTM! Consider improving the comment clarity.

The solution effectively addresses the context update issue while avoiding render loops.

Consider improving the comment clarity:

-//force rerender because chaging a ref does not update the context
-//changing provided to a useState will result in a rendering loop because of the useLayoutEffect below 
+// Force re-render when context ref changes, as ref updates don't trigger re-renders
+// Note: Using useState here would create an infinite loop due to the useLayoutEffect below
src/core/component.test.tsx (1)

247-251: LGTM! Fix empty object type.

The Component1 changes effectively test the readonly prop behavior.

Replace the empty object type with a proper interface as flagged by static analysis:

-const Component2 = createCesiumComponent<string, {}>({
+const Component2 = createCesiumComponent<string, Record<string, never>>({
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 21cc8bc and 1b2a700.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/core/component.test.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/core/hooks.ts (7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/core/component.test.tsx

[error] 254-254: Don't use '{}' as a type.

Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".

(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/core/hooks.ts (1)

169-169: LGTM! Verify impact of context dependency.

The addition of ctx to dependency arrays ensures proper reactivity to context changes.

Let's verify that the context dependency doesn't cause unnecessary re-renders:

Also applies to: 234-234, 276-276, 317-317

✅ Verification successful

LGTM! Context dependency is correctly implemented

The ctx dependency in the dependency arrays is necessary and properly used:

  • updateProperties uses ctx in the update callback and event manager operations
  • mount uses ctx for element creation and context provision
  • unmount uses ctx for cleanup and event management
  • The effect hook properly tracks context changes for updating properties

The context changes will not cause unnecessary re-renders because:

  1. Context is only used for essential operations (creation, updates, and cleanup)
  2. Updates are guarded by shallow prop comparison (shallowEquals)
  3. Context updates are batched through React's scheduling
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for context usage patterns in effects and callbacks
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($$$, [$$$ctx$$$])' 
ast-grep --pattern 'useCallback($$$, [$$$ctx$$$])'

Length of output: 103


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the context usage
# First, let's see the actual file content around these lines
cat src/core/hooks.ts

# Also search for ctx usage patterns in the codebase
rg "ctx" src/core/hooks.ts -B 2 -A 2

Length of output: 13112

src/core/component.test.tsx (1)

267-282: LGTM! Test coverage is comprehensive.

The test assertions effectively verify both the initial context state and updates when readOnlyProp changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant