sign_algo: fix inappropriate rustdoc comments. #152
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Rustdoc doesn't generate rustdoc comments for expression fields. This commit replaces 4 occurrences of such comments in `sign_algo.rs` with normal comments to avoid breakage from more stringent checks for this condition in nightly rust.
djc
approved these changes
Sep 5, 2023
I think this change is in the spirit of the exceptions that don't require est31's stamp so I'm going to merge this one. If you'd prefer I don't do that again in the future, please leave a comment so I can adjust my heuristic. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rustdoc doesn't generate rustdoc comments for expression fields. This commit replaces 4 occurrences of such comments in
sign_algo.rswith normal comments to avoid breakage from more stringent checks for this condition in nightly rust.