ROX-26604: Add layer lineage to RHEL v2 data model

[dcaravel]

Description

Fixes an edge case that could cause discrepancies in scan versions, packages, etc. when images have a common layer but with different parent layers.

CI issues will be fixed by #1737

Testing

Unit and e2e tests added. Test image details at stackrox/stackrox#13558

Also manually tested. The test images below have the same top/bottom layers but different middle layers, also they have tags that represent the version of the openjdk packages within the image for comparison.

Before fix:
Wrong version returned for 2nd scan:

$ rctl image scan -f --image=quay.io/dcaravel/temp:jdk-17.0.11.0.9-2.el8.x86_64 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.scan.components[] | select (.name == "java-17-openjdk-headless") | .name,.version'

java-17-openjdk-headless
1:17.0.11.0.9-2.el8.x86_64

$ rctl image scan -f --image=quay.io/dcaravel/temp:jdk-17.0.12.0.7-2.el8.x86_64 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.scan.components[] | select (.name == "java-17-openjdk-headless") | .name,.version'

java-17-openjdk-headless
1:17.0.11.0.9-2.el8.x86_64

After fix:
Correct versions returned for both scans

$ rctl image scan -f --image=quay.io/dcaravel/temp:jdk-17.0.11.0.9-2.el8.x86_64 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.scan.components[] | select (.name == "java-17-openjdk-headless") | .name,.version'

java-17-openjdk-headless
1:17.0.11.0.9-2.el8.x86_64

$ rctl image scan -f --image=quay.io/dcaravel/temp:jdk-17.0.12.0.7-2.el8.x86_64 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.scan.components[] | select (.name == "java-17-openjdk-headless") | .name,.version'

java-17-openjdk-headless
1:17.0.12.0.7-2.el8.x86_64

[openshift-ci]

@dcaravel: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-tests	7ecfa77	link	false	/test e2e-tests

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[dcaravel]

Current CI failures will be fixed by #1737 - once merged will rebase this PR.