Derivations for acf->psd, the spectral ar form, and lorentzian bias #33
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I finished the math connecting ACF <-> PSD <-> AR(1) in the context of timescales. A summary of the added notebook:
1. ACF as an AR(1)
The ACF can be represented in terms of the AR(1) coefficient,$\varphi$ .
2. PSD is equal the the abs(fft(A(t))^2, giving the AR(1) spectral form
The AR(1) PSD is the the spectral representation of an exponentially decaying ACF,$A(t)$ , confirmed using the Fourier transform and Wiener–Khinchin theorem.
3) Lorentzian Bias
The common Lorentzian spectral form is:
The notebook shows how to derive this from the AR(1) spectral form. This requires two approximations that introduce bias to timescale estimation: a cosine approximation and an approximation of$\frac{1-\varphi}{\sqrt{\varphi}}$ . This bias increases as $\varphi$ becomes smaller, timescales become shorter, or as the knee frequency approaches the Nyquist frequency. Instead, it's recommended to learn $\varphi$ and $\tau$ from the unbiased AR(1) spectral form:
where