Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove pool2d MLRoundingType - Simplify the operand layout support of conv2d and pooling 2d operations #770
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Remove pool2d MLRoundingType - Simplify the operand layout support of conv2d and pooling 2d operations #770
Changes from 3 commits
3c9dd92
ce04478
fdde61f
2e35d5d
8761da5
9a6bc2e
84d78fe
54aacac
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
outputSizes
is optional, we should keep this checking. I feel the existing code has an issue, it should useoutputSizes
if it is given?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, the previous
if
looked like a typo (so that should be fixed in any case).Well, with this change,
outputSizes
would be required (caller is explicit now). Do you think this simplification to be problematic/burdensome? 🤔There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then
outputSizes
is not an option anymore, should it be moved to another parameter? LikeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/#prefer-dictionaries suggests:
...but it also says:
I'd err on the side of putting required arguments into the dictionary - and making the dictionary itself required - because:
averagePool2d(input, {outputSizes: [2, 3]})
>averagePool2d(input, [2, 3])
averagePool2d(input, {outputSizes: [2, 3], layout: "nchw"})
>averagePool2d(input, [2, 3], {layout: "nchw"})
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
SGTM. Thanks for the explanation, @a-sully !
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fine with me. Will do.
Hmm, the following doesn't work (bikeshed error as
required
can be used on fields but evidently not parameters):So I presume you meant to just remove the "= {}" instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The outputSizes validation above in 13.2 doesn't appear to be correct--shouldn't it be similar to this logic?