Add MFA "UI only" removal blog post #119
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Preview: Precedent for having two authors, although it looks weird next to a single portrait: https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems.github.io/blob/master/_posts/2018-02-24-tls-10-and-11-deprecation-notice.md?plain=1#L4 |
jenshenny
reviewed
Jul 20, 2022
sonalkr132
reviewed
Aug 7, 2022
sonalkr132
reviewed
Aug 7, 2022
kevinlinxc
force-pushed
the
mfa-ui-only-removed
branch
from
3441156
to
2846002
Compare
|
@sonalkr132 Do you think this is ready to put out? The date is set for today. |
simi
approved these changes
Aug 22, 2022
|
Awesome. thank you. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Part of Deprecate ui_only and migrate users to ui_and_gem_signin, an effort to remove the
UI onlyMFA level for Rubygems which has been deemed insecure.Users can no longer change their MFA level to UI Only after rubygems/rubygems.org#3084 was merged about a month ago, and this blog post explains why.
Dates:
I picked the following dates somewhat arbitrarily and would like to know if they are fine:
July 26th for the blog post date
August 26th for the day of
UI only->UI and gem signinmigrationRelated
When this blog post is out, it could be linked in this guide PR too: rubygems/guides#311