-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 401
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introduced inertia/symmetric3 minus operators #2204
Open
cmastalli
wants to merge
6
commits into
stack-of-tasks:devel
Choose a base branch
from
cmastalli:topic/inertia-minus-operators
base: devel
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2a025d5
[spatial] Added minus operator in symmetric3
cmastalli 69f1933
[spatial] Added inertia minus operators
cmastalli c4ac479
[changelog] Updated changelog
cmastalli a814324
[spatial] Reused mab and removed eval in minus operators (inertia)
cmastalli c78e77a
[spatial] Used eps to compute lever in FromDynamicParameters
cmastalli 13d6acb
[spatial] Assert mass is positive
cmastalli File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be nice to check whether the resulting inertia remains physically consistent, certainly with an assert.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have included asserts for checking mass is positive (here and in
FromDynamicParameters
). However, I wonder what is the expected design for this class. ShouldInertialTpl
handle fully physically consistent only? Or could it accept "partial" physical consistency or anything?For instance, the
Random
function generates positive masses and rotational inertias with positive principal components of inertia. However, this is not what we refer to as fully physical consistency. This condition also implies having positive second moments of inertia, i.e., satisfying the named "triangular inequalities". In short, Random function doesn't support full physical consistency, just a partial physical consistency.Moreover,
FromDynamicParameters
doesn't assert positive masses or rotation inertia triangular inequalities. In short, FromDynamicParameters function supports any type of parameter including the ones that don't satisfy physics. It doesn't follow the same convention used inRandom
.In conclusion, I am inclined
Please let me know what are your thoughts and how to proceed with this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jcarpent -- please let me know your thoughts. I still think we should not include these asserts as resulting operators might not necessarily satisfy fully physical consistency. The reason is this class should change much more to do that. We can arrange a meeting to discuss this.
Be aware that the unit tests are not passing because they are designed to test conditions that don't meet full physical consistency. I'll need to modify them if we want to do that.