-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
isolate the theory of lime_sup #1121
Conversation
What about adding these (loosely related) lemmas https://github.com/zstone1/analysis/blob/total_variation/theories/realfun.v#L1323-L1352 |
at least related to this one https://github.com/affeldt-aist/analysis/blob/limr_sup/theories/realfun.v#L88-L105 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The repeated proofs about swapping between sequential and filter convergence are annoying, but tough to fix without a little extra machinery.
The interesting question is about generalizing this to consider the lim_sup of a function "at a filter". If it's an easy generalization, we should do it now. If it's tough, then we may have to revisit the material when we do sequence limsups.
Section cvgr_fun_cvg_seq. | ||
Context {R : realType}. | ||
|
||
Lemma cvg_at_rightP (f : R -> R) (p l : R) : |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In a textbook all four of these proofs would be three liners:
- In first countable spaces, filter convergence <-> sequence convergence
- The lower (upper) limit topology (AKA sogenfrey line) is first countable
- All sequences in the lower (upper) limit topology that converge, do so from the left (right).
The proof you have is fine, I'm not complaining about it. I am complaining that some missing classical machinery is making these proofs longer than necessary. A problem for another day, I guess.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One meaningful question about the right sided limit. And then, if you're up for it, generalizing more of the lemmas to work for limf
Co-authored-by: Zachary Stone <[email protected]>
* isolate the theory of lime_sup - generic def of limsup --------- Co-authored-by: Zachary Stone <[email protected]>
* isolate the theory of lime_sup - generic def of limsup --------- Co-authored-by: Zachary Stone <[email protected]>
Motivation for this change
from the PR #1065 on the Lebesgue differentiation theorem
Things done/to do
CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.md
Compatibility with MathComp 2.0
TODO: HB port
to make sure someone ports this PR tothe
hierarchy-builder
branch or I already opened an issue or PR (please cross reference).Automatic note to reviewers
Read this Checklist and put a milestone if possible.